• Contact
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe to Newsletter
Decarbonisation News
  • Home
  • Key Sectors
    • Energy
    • Aviation & Shipping
    • Steel
    • Green Construction
    • Mining
    • Automotive
    • Agriculture & Food
    • Forestry & Land use
    • Technology
  • By Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • North America
    • South America
  • In-Depth
    • Opinion
    • Interview
    • Feature
  • Podcast
No Result
View All Result
Menu
  • Home
  • Key Sectors
    • Energy
    • Aviation & Shipping
    • Steel
    • Green Construction
    • Mining
    • Automotive
    • Agriculture & Food
    • Forestry & Land use
    • Technology
  • By Regions
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • North America
    • South America
  • In-Depth
    • Opinion
    • Interview
    • Feature
  • Podcast
Decarbonisation News
No Result
View All Result
REPORT: How the world’s biggest brands let billions go to waste by failing to explain their sustainability programmes

Apple has the highest sustainability perceptions value of any brand 'consumers have clear confidence that Apple is committed enough to minimising its negative impacts'

REPORT: How the world’s biggest brands let billions go to waste by failing to explain their sustainability programmes

by Gary Wright
March 21, 2024
in Feature

The Sustainability Perceptions Index is based on a study of over 150,000 respondents across 40 countries and reveals how important sustainability is in driving consumer choice and which brands consumers perceive as most sustainable,

New research from leading valuation firm Brand Finance, in association with CSRHub and the International Advertising Association (IAA), indicates that the world’s biggest brands are missing out on billions of dollars of potential value by failing to properly communicate their sustainability achievements and progress.

Brand Finance’s Sustainability Perceptions Index is based on a study of over 150,000 respondents across 40 countries. Key outputs include:

  • the role of sustainability in driving choice in each industry
  • the brands that global consumers believe are most committed to sustainability
  • the financial value of a reputation for sustainability
  • the value at risk, or value to be gained, arising from a gap between sustainability perceptions and performance

Apple has the highest sustainability perceptions value of any brand, USD33.3 billion. This huge sum is driven by a combination of Apple’s financial scale and supportive consumer perception. Actual sustainability performance aside, our research shows that consumers have clear confidence that Apple is committed enough to minimising its negative impacts for them continue buying and paying a premium for its products.

Microsoft has the second highest total value (USD22.7billion), along with the highest ‘gap value’ of any brand in the index – USD3.2 billion. Microsoft has engaged extensively in sustainability initiatives, including committing to becoming carbon neutral, water positive, and zero waste by 2030. Yet its communication of its commitment and progress has been somewhat muted. The implication of this is that with concerted effort to communicate its sustainability achievements more effectively, Microsoft could add over USD3 billion of value for shareholders. 

Microsoft is not alone in leaving value on the table in this way – 85 brands have a positive gap value of over USD100 million, totalling USD25 billion.

At the other end of the spectrum is Tesla – a pioneer of the electric vehicles and battery technology aiding the transition to a lower-carbon economy. This image has carried across into the sustainability perceptions held by global consumers. Tesla is seen in several countries, including Mexico and the UK, as the brand with the greatest commitment to environmental sustainability. However, the strength of this perception creates its own risk; whilst Tesla performs fairly well on perceived sustainability, it falls significantly short of peer average on sustainability performance. As a result, Tesla has USD1.5 billion of value at risk.

Brand Finance’s Strategy & Sustainability Director, Robert Haigh, commented, “Brands have to strike a fine balance when communicating about sustainability. Consumers are now rightly attuned to potential greenwashing; in response, brands are becoming too precautionary and restrictive in their approach to sustainability communications. This greenhushing could reduce the incentive for competitors to improve their performance, slowing progress industry-wide. Just as importantly, these brands are letting financial go to waste, short-changing shareholders and other stakeholders in the process.”

Dagmara Szulce Managing Director, IAA Global, commented, “We see this as an incredibly potent tool to incentivize action that aligns with the UN SDGs and wider aims of the UN Global Compact. By highlighting the financial value that is contingent on sustainability perceptions, we hope to harness businesses’ profit motive, moving them past the point where they see sustainability as a ‘hygiene factor’, to a point of rapid, concerted action.”

See the full report HERE

About Brand Finance

Brand Finance is the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy. Bridging the gap between marketing and finance for more than 25 years, Brand Finance evaluates the strength of brands and quantifies their financial value to help organizations of all kinds make strategic decisions.

Headquartered in London, Brand Finance has offices in over 20 countries, offering services on all continents. Every year, Brand Finance conducts more than 6,000 brand valuations, supported by original market research, and publishes over 100 reports which rank brands across all sectors and countries.

Disclaimer

Brand Finance has produced this study with an independent and unbiased analysis. Brand Finance accepts no responsibility and will not be liable if the publicly available information relied upon is subsequently found to be inaccurate. The opinions and financial analysis expressed in the study are not to be construed as providing investment or business advice. Brand Finance does not intend the study to be relied upon for any reason and excludes all liability to any individual, government, or organisation.

The data presented in this study form part of Brand Finance’s proprietary database, are provided for the benefit of the media, and are not to be used in part or in full for any commercial or technical purpose without written permission from Brand Finance.

Related Stories

decarbonisationnews=decarbonisation-denniswang
Energy

India warns of retaliation over EU’s carbon tax

May 7, 2025
How Supplier Engagement is Advancing ESG in the Middle East
Opinion

How Supplier Engagement is Advancing ESG in the Middle East

March 13, 2025
decarbonisationnews-decarbonisation
Energy

Norway restart work on Oslo waste carbon capture project

January 27, 2025

More News

Energy

India warns of retaliation over EU’s carbon tax

May 7, 2025
Opinion

How Supplier Engagement is Advancing ESG in the Middle East

March 13, 2025
Energy

Norway restart work on Oslo waste carbon capture project

January 27, 2025
Analysis

Harnessing the power of interconnectors to advance renewable energy

January 24, 2025
Opinion

Sustainable Access Control: Aligning Security with Environmental Goals

November 27, 2024
46E1D52E-6436-4BFC-88F1-8D2436EEB39A
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Podcast
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
Instagram Linkedin
©2024 Decarbonisation News | All Rights Reserved
No Result
View All Result

© 2025 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.